Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/18/06 16:41
Read: times


 
#116525 - I directly quoted you, so who started th
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Erik, since we're making this personal ...
Where I went personal, I directly quoted you, so who started that?

(a) you haven't corrected me.
of course not, since you have talked apples, which, as far as I recall, are different from oranges.

(b) you have yet to show where the negative supply you insist on has a role in receiving RS232 signals, let alone impvoing noise margins.
Where have I claimed that a "negative supply" improves anything> I have discussed input thresholds. OK, if you can prove - which you can't - that a noise margin of, whatever you can achieve with gnd and +3 (less than 3V due to saturation) is as good as a noise margin of 6V, I'll give in

(c) you've already stated in your own words that you can't produce any support for your notion that using a negative supply increases noise margins
Richard, come on I have said that a -3 input threshold "increases noise margins", I have NEVER stated ANYTHING about a supply except that the negative supply - if not used - does not do anything. If you want to refute my arguments, refer to what I said, not something else.

I've invited you to show a specification of any sort that indicates that even the MAX devices use their negative supply for that purpose.
Please find where I have stated the above. Again I discuss noise margins, you keep discussing chips ONCE MORE you reply to a statement about apples by discussing oranges.

This is getting far out of hand, you keep babbeling about "supply" I have not discussed supply, I have discussed threshold. You keep discussing chip, I discuss the merits of a negative threshold, as opposed to ~ +0.6V, I do not know where it comes from that you keep discussing chips and claim that argues agains an input voltage threshold statement.

If you can not live with me not agreeing with me, do continue this thread, I have no problem with you not agreeing with me if you present the disagreement as such, not by stating "the claim of twice the noise marging is better is false". You keep stating that I am wrong, where, in contrats, I have stated that your "solution" very well may work, just has a lesser noise margin.

Erik

OK a proposal
I agree that many chips use 0 and +3 as input thresholds.
YOU agree that +3 and -3 will give a better noise margin.

That should settle it, you get your chips (apples), I get my science (oranges).

List of 68 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
hardware setup of AT89C51ED2            01/01/70 00:00      
   RTFM            01/01/70 00:00      
   board's setup            01/01/70 00:00      
   has been discussed            01/01/70 00:00      
   AT89C51ED2 in ISP            01/01/70 00:00      
      no 'unique' schematc needed            01/01/70 00:00      
      thanks joel            01/01/70 00:00      
    I sent for your email the schematic!            01/01/70 00:00      
   FLIP            01/01/70 00:00      
      sample code            01/01/70 00:00      
         program in assembly?            01/01/70 00:00      
            sample code in c            01/01/70 00:00      
   ISP without MAX232            01/01/70 00:00      
      that old gem again            01/01/70 00:00      
         A gem is always a gem            01/01/70 00:00      
            it does not help that you respond s..t a            01/01/70 00:00      
      Re: ISP without MAX232            01/01/70 00:00      
         To stop an urban legend ... seems imposs            01/01/70 00:00      
            just for the sake of argument ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               very clearly stated            01/01/70 00:00      
                  That's GREEN cheese!            01/01/70 00:00      
            from old time...            01/01/70 00:00      
               there you go            01/01/70 00:00      
               How about the 1488/1489?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  this all started with            01/01/70 00:00      
                     well, I read that, but ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        but            01/01/70 00:00      
                           the standard still deserves a look            01/01/70 00:00      
            reminds me of the burden cap argument.            01/01/70 00:00      
         RS232 without -V explained            01/01/70 00:00      
            There is two ways to do things: by desig            01/01/70 00:00      
            Do never do            01/01/70 00:00      
               Answer in shematic of your post            01/01/70 00:00      
            I wouldn't rely on that ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               true, if you have no noise margin worrie            01/01/70 00:00      
                  What??? You imply the 1489 won't work?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     what is a 1489? and what is the issue            01/01/70 00:00      
                        it's what we used before the Max-xxxx            01/01/70 00:00      
                           who said 'require'?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              I think you're dreaming.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 yes, I 'dream' noise immunity            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    and you're prepared to show ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       I can't            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Try this link            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             I hope the datasheet is wrong            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Nope, it isn't wrong ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Another gem? Well explained!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      so, now the crap is "justifued"            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   hy do you keep beating a desd horse            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      I'm not the one doing the beating            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         I never said that            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            Hysteresis, ... sure ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Interesting ...            01/01/70 00:00      
          Just wait, next time it may very            01/01/70 00:00      
   you keep hammering 'needed'            01/01/70 00:00      
      No, in fact you haven't            01/01/70 00:00      
         standard            01/01/70 00:00      
            Of course I adhere to standards            01/01/70 00:00      
               I did not make the standard            01/01/70 00:00      
                  As long as you're arguing with me ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I directly quoted you, so who started th            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Erik, you need some practice            01/01/70 00:00      
                           That should settle it, you get your chip            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Chill brothers            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Time for a rendezvous            01/01/70 00:00      
                           to the two above            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Where's the science?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 science            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List