| ??? 07/23/07 15:47 Read: times |
#142180 - Have you thought about what you said? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
Richard Erlacher said:
there's really nothing "better" about the modern ISP-capable FLASH-based parts for most applications that use little or no I/O 1) what does ISP have to do with amount of I/O. That is not an ISP issue that is an internal memory issue. Perhaps you've overlooked your previous argument, that external memory consumes two ports. 2) with an ISP chip you do not end up destroying your chip by continous removal and insertin. You might remove and reinsert socketed memory components, but not the "chip." 3) with ISP you do not need to buy a programmer of go through the frustration of (trying to) bild one on the kitchen table. I believe the last 1000 posts regarding ISP and IAP problems with and commercially available and home-built adapters will contradict that notion. 4) we all knoe that, as far as you are concerned, nothing new is 'better'
Erik I simply continue to assert that WE should address the O/P's question, and not begin by questioning his intent. He asked about how to make his existing hardware work. RE |
