| ??? 06/22/05 18:07 Read: times |
#95624 - Broadcast Vs Addressing Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The may be around 50 devices, i would have to address earch one and there could be 10,20 or 30 devices instead
This will increase the complexity of the program, there could be benneficts from addressing each device. What if i broadcast the commands each second for 10 min and repeat the command each hour? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Power Line Channel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| broadcast in noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Broadcast Vs Addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| erk | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just some things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Got it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Horses for Courses | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just curious, why not a photocell at eac | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Radio | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Zigbee? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| great minds think alike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you have my deepest sympathy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Baby steps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Connection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hmmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MSN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| K k | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| kilometer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what would he mean? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Binary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is no guess, is only know. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mexico | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| X10 -like | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Actualization | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| K k | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| kHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Andy Neil alias Mr. Perfectionist !! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| X10 like | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pulse position? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Existing systems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pulse position | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AT89S8252 : lcd | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Huh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Off-Topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| impedance matching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I see dead computers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
file transfer using power lines | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| X2 Rated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RF switching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try it ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ya, sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| $200? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not necessarily Xbee | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maybe... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| mains born network | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8000 pieces | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cost? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SNR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| BER | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| checksum to the hilt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CRC, not checksum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Duplex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if he can afford an occasional miss | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| checksum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| checksum and short | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Test set | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1143.12345 Hz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maybe once in a year | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Idea CRC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SNR ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lower frequencies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Noise Floor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 10% | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Data Rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re:10% error rate | 01/01/70 00:00 |