??? 06/30/05 13:07 Read: times |
#96303 - if he can afford an occasional miss Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The master needs to know that the slave acknowledges the signal. So we are talking bi-directional signals. Christian said he wants receivers only. How do you square that !
First "superchecksumming" i.e. checksumming every bit, every byte and every record (use CRC where possible). This will avoid a "lamp off" being read as "lamp on" in more than one case of a few million (if needed, someine else can do the math). Second, in a round robin fashion, send all lamp messages all the time. Transmission problems may lead to a lamp not switching till, say, 10 cycles later but I doubt that an occasional delay of a few seconds in the status of a lamp will kill the project. Erik BTW Christian, if the lamps are tungsten, do remember that the resistance is very low when cold (your switch need to be able to handle the inrush current) |
Topic | Author | Date |
Power Line Channel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
broadcast in noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Broadcast Vs Addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
erk | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Just some things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Got it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Horses for Courses | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
just curious, why not a photocell at eac | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Radio | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Zigbee? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
great minds think alike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you have my deepest sympathy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Baby steps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Connection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hmmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
MSN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
K k | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
kilometer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what would he mean? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Binary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is no guess, is only know. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Mexico | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
X10 -like | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Actualization | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
K k | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
kHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Andy Neil alias Mr. Perfectionist !! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
X10 like | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pulse position? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Existing systems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pulse position | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AT89S8252 : lcd | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Huh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Off-Topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
impedance matching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I see dead computers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
file transfer using power lines![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
X2 Rated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RF switching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try it ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ya, sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
$200? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not necessarily Xbee | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
another solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
well... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
mains born network | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
8000 pieces | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cost? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SNR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BER | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
checksum to the hilt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CRC, not checksum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Duplex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if he can afford an occasional miss | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
checksum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
checksum and short | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Test set | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
1143.12345 Hz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe once in a year | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Idea CRC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SNR ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Lower frequencies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Noise Floor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
10% | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Data Rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:10% error rate | 01/01/70 00:00 |