??? 06/29/05 21:38 Read: times |
#96247 - not really Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Sounds like he is the boss from Dilbert! You can't determine cost until you have a known working design.
Not really, one important design parameter is cost. If you do not know max cost up front, you may spend weeks designing something that is not feasible. That this often result in an answer "impossible" is another thing. If you do not have a cost target, you may propose a Cadillac when the customer can only afford a small Chevy. Anyhow at 8000 units, I do not think the cost target of $20 is totally ridiculous, although he may save money by building 10.000 instead (has happened to me). What Christion need to do is to make some experiments with transmit in one end of the wire and receieve at the other (careful with them fingers). Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Power Line Channel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
broadcast in noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Broadcast Vs Addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
erk | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Just some things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Got it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Horses for Courses | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
just curious, why not a photocell at eac | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Radio | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Zigbee? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
great minds think alike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you have my deepest sympathy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Baby steps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Connection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hmmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
MSN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
K k | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
kilometer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what would he mean? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Binary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is no guess, is only know. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Mexico | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
X10 -like | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Actualization | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
K k | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
kHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Andy Neil alias Mr. Perfectionist !! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
X10 like | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pulse position? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Existing systems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pulse position | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AT89S8252 : lcd | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Huh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Off-Topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
impedance matching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I see dead computers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
file transfer using power lines![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
X2 Rated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RF switching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try it ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ya, sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
$200? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not necessarily Xbee | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
another solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
well... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
mains born network | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
8000 pieces | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cost? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SNR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BER | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
checksum to the hilt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CRC, not checksum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Duplex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if he can afford an occasional miss | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
checksum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
checksum and short | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Test set | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
1143.12345 Hz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe once in a year | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Idea CRC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SNR ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Lower frequencies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Noise Floor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
10% | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Data Rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:10% error rate | 01/01/70 00:00 |