??? 07/01/05 13:21 Read: times |
#96389 - re:10% error rate Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Is it possible to just send the command multiple times?
If that does not work for you, then you must send each byte using an error correction scheme such as CRC or some other error correction scheme. Here is a link: http://www.cuj.com/documents...yP78ZXN06K This describes an algorithm to do CRC error checking. Jacob |
Topic | Author | Date |
Power Line Channel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
broadcast in noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Broadcast Vs Addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
erk | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Just some things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Got it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Horses for Courses | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
just curious, why not a photocell at eac | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Radio | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Zigbee? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
great minds think alike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you have my deepest sympathy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Baby steps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Connection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hmmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
MSN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
K k | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
kilometer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what would he mean? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Binary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is no guess, is only know. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Mexico | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
X10 -like | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Actualization | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
K k | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
kHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Andy Neil alias Mr. Perfectionist !! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
X10 like | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pulse position? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Existing systems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pulse position | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AT89S8252 : lcd | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Huh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Off-Topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
impedance matching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I see dead computers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
file transfer using power lines![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
X2 Rated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RF switching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try it ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ya, sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
$200? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not necessarily Xbee | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
another solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
well... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
mains born network | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
8000 pieces | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cost? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SNR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BER | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
checksum to the hilt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CRC, not checksum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Duplex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if he can afford an occasional miss | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
checksum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
checksum and short | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Test set | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
1143.12345 Hz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe once in a year | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Idea CRC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SNR ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Lower frequencies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Noise Floor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
10% | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Data Rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:10% error rate | 01/01/70 00:00 |