??? 06/29/05 18:24 Read: times |
#96218 - maybe... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Christian Kleiber said:
I can't affort to make 8000 receivers/transmitters
a receiver is only going to receive, and not going to retransmitt the message, it would be too expensive But signalling over the mains will require expensive isolation, and you don't even know how you're going to do it yet! I think the $30-$200 radio units mentioned before are fully-packaged, standalone products. "Component-level" modules intended to be designed-in ("embedded") to your product would be far cheaper |
Topic | Author | Date |
Power Line Channel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
broadcast in noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Broadcast Vs Addressing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
erk | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Just some things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Got it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Horses for Courses | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
just curious, why not a photocell at eac | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Radio | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Zigbee? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
great minds think alike | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you have my deepest sympathy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Baby steps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Connection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hmmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
MSN | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nop | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
K k | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
kilometer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what would he mean? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Binary | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is no guess, is only know. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Mexico | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
X10 -like | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Actualization | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
K k | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
kHz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Andy Neil alias Mr. Perfectionist !! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
X10 like | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pulse position? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Existing systems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pulse position | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AT89S8252 : lcd | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Huh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Off-Topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
impedance matching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I see dead computers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
file transfer using power lines![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
X2 Rated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RF switching | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Try it ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ya, sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
$200? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not necessarily Xbee | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
another solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
well... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
mains born network | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
8000 pieces | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not really | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cost? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Cost | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SNR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
BER | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
checksum to the hilt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
CRC, not checksum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Duplex | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
if he can afford an occasional miss | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
checksum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
checksum and short | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Test set | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
1143.12345 Hz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe once in a year | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Idea CRC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SNR ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Lower frequencies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Noise Floor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
10% | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Data Rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re:10% error rate | 01/01/70 00:00 |