??? 06/01/07 01:14 Read: times |
#140133 - No hidden agenda Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I didn't name who I work for a couple of reasons:
- I didn't want to be accused of advertising or spamming for naming a tool company that I have a vested interest in. - I didn't want it to become an "I've used your tools and they're good/bad/blah" thread. - I haven't been asked to do this by any of my bosses. I'm going to be working on how our tools generate debug information and I am genuinely interested in what people think and want from their tools. After all who wants to be working on something that no-one wants or will use... it'd be a waste of time. So I'm sorry if anyone feels I have 'tricked' them, that was not my intent. If the debug tools could address this issue, we wouldn't have to choose between debugability and optimisation - we could have both!
So, come on Ryan (and any other tool developers listening) - there's a challenge for you! That's what I'm going to be aiming for. Anyhow Ryan, say hi to Clyde from me, I was "the betatester" of the '51/XA tools at one time and had almost weekly conversations with him. I shall do, thanks for the comments. |