Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/05/05 04:05
Read: times


 
#92961 - More....
Responding to: ???'s previous message

Its always wise to buffer any signal going to/from the 'outside world'. Also for conformance with the CE directives you need to protect to inputs/outputs from accepting or radiating EMI and suseptability to ESD transients.

For low frequency inputs, re-arranging your R & C so that you get a low pass filter helps to protect against ESD as well as giving some overvoltage protection. Be aware of the effect of this R & C as it affects risetime! You can add MOVs and/or transzorbs for superior protection. It always pays to think what voltages might appear on an input in normal (ab)use. One instance is RS485 - on my equipment there is 24VDC also present so one might think a customer might wire 24VDC to the RS485 connections. The poor old transzorb will die and propably go up in smoke - not good. So I add a polyswitch in series so that it limits the current to the transzorb. If someone wires 220VAC to it there will be smoke - but they would have to be real stupid!
Find yourself a old fuel injection computer from a car and observe what techniques they use - in most cases they have a R & C on every input.

Remember that MOVs have a fair amount of capacitance that varies from manufactuter to manufacturer whereas transzorbs have very little capacitance - therefore transzorbs are generally better for higher speed signals.

Say you have a high current switched output, its wise to put current limiting on this so that a short circuit won't cause smoke.

All these extras add complexity to the design but add a whole lot of robustness.

There's plenty written about these issues on the web.


List of 40 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Your opinion about port config pls.            01/01/70 00:00      
   Its irrelevant            01/01/70 00:00      
      Can you clearify pls?            01/01/70 00:00      
         always            01/01/70 00:00      
   More....            01/01/70 00:00      
      Elementary, my dear Watson            01/01/70 00:00      
   Some reference circuits I've looked at            01/01/70 00:00      
      fittness for purpose            01/01/70 00:00      
         I'd second that            01/01/70 00:00      
         The intention is...            01/01/70 00:00      
            on-board, I hope            01/01/70 00:00      
               I2c is forbidden to leave the board...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I would'nt            01/01/70 00:00      
   The outside world            01/01/70 00:00      
      Sure, you did! ;-)            01/01/70 00:00      
         Multi controller approach.            01/01/70 00:00      
            Some practical restrictions...            01/01/70 00:00      
               concentrate the data            01/01/70 00:00      
               Something like this.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  maybe not needed            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RS485 Stubs.            01/01/70 00:00      
                        two of the same            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Re: Two of the same.            01/01/70 00:00      
                              you are right            01/01/70 00:00      
                  let Geert do it differently            01/01/70 00:00      
                     on data and star            01/01/70 00:00      
                        bus and star            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I prefer 75176 -> RS485 & 75179 -> RS422            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I've got a lot of 75176s in my drawer :)            01/01/70 00:00      
                           What about CAN?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              CAN            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 CAN            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    CAN CAN            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Challenges, indeed...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I would            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    how about Power Line Communications?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       X10-alike, I suppose?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Ya..            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Always welcome...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             oops !!!            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List