Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/05/05 08:51
Read: times


 
#92972 - The intention is...
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Hi Jan, Russel,

The intention of the board is that it'll be used to control my home automaton (or how do you call this?) system.

I'm now busy with a kind of simulation board, to see if everything I want to do is feasible. So, the drawings I posted are part of that simulation/test board.

But finally, the project I'm working on is to be classified somewhere in between hobby and commercial, since all controls of my whole house will have to 'run' on it. It's not a 'does it work? fine, does it not work? too bad' situation... ;-)

Controls such as detection of pressing the light switch button, control relays/contactors to put 220V on the outlets (or take it away from it), temp. measurement, light measurement, control of water pumps for the heating system, etc...

All this will be based on the I2c protocol. So, the processor will mostly take care of the 'clever' work, while the other components, will to the 'hard labour'.

The components which will mainly be used, are:
- PCF8574 for IO purposes (detection light switch control, so input, and switching relays, so output).
- PCF8591 for temp. measurement purposes (AD converter)
- TDA8444 for DA conversion (controlling of dimmers).

Those components will be isolated from the 'heavy' components by means of optocouplers, since I want a complete 'isolation' between the inside and the outside world. So, I won't control a relay directly from the PCF8574 pin, but an optocoupler will trigger a transistor on the 'other' side of the electronics, which will then control the relais.

But suppose I want to go outside with my uC ports, what buffers are most suited then, given the explanation above, thus knowing now that it's not intended to be used for extremely fast things?

Best rgds,

--Geert

List of 40 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Your opinion about port config pls.            01/01/70 00:00      
   Its irrelevant            01/01/70 00:00      
      Can you clearify pls?            01/01/70 00:00      
         always            01/01/70 00:00      
   More....            01/01/70 00:00      
      Elementary, my dear Watson            01/01/70 00:00      
   Some reference circuits I've looked at            01/01/70 00:00      
      fittness for purpose            01/01/70 00:00      
         I'd second that            01/01/70 00:00      
         The intention is...            01/01/70 00:00      
            on-board, I hope            01/01/70 00:00      
               I2c is forbidden to leave the board...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I would'nt            01/01/70 00:00      
   The outside world            01/01/70 00:00      
      Sure, you did! ;-)            01/01/70 00:00      
         Multi controller approach.            01/01/70 00:00      
            Some practical restrictions...            01/01/70 00:00      
               concentrate the data            01/01/70 00:00      
               Something like this.            01/01/70 00:00      
                  maybe not needed            01/01/70 00:00      
                     RS485 Stubs.            01/01/70 00:00      
                        two of the same            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Re: Two of the same.            01/01/70 00:00      
                              you are right            01/01/70 00:00      
                  let Geert do it differently            01/01/70 00:00      
                     on data and star            01/01/70 00:00      
                        bus and star            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I prefer 75176 -> RS485 & 75179 -> RS422            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I've got a lot of 75176s in my drawer :)            01/01/70 00:00      
                           What about CAN?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              CAN            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 CAN            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    CAN CAN            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Challenges, indeed...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I would            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    how about Power Line Communications?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       X10-alike, I suppose?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Ya..            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Always welcome...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             oops !!!            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List