| interfacing 8155 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| First step | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| what IS 8155? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| a RIOT | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I just had a look | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It is older, | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| it can SEEM to you all you like, but ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It is NMOS | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes, it's NMOS, but that's no problem | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Also in CMOS | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Waferscale PSM, uPSD | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Proud to be a dummy from time to time... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| \'help\' and \'help\' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Sadly, one can't tell the difference | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Old man's rant! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| not all, but most | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| True | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I can't sit back anymore | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| advice that do not coddle you you should try to ge | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Every Enginner | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It's the same old thing ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| communication | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| The communication problem's yours, too | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I did, several times, and in all cases (s)he was | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Well, your boss was clearly a moron | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| 1.000.000 miles off target | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Try Google ... it\\\'s straighten you out | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I'd be that anyway | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Nevertheless, you've no business in this case | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| if the OP is on the road to perdition or the road | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That's one mile, to great precision. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| based on which side of 'the pond' you write to. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| in fact ther is/was | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| elaboration | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| code | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| you're going to get into trouble | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Erik, why do you always do this? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| answered in my other responses today | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Isn't it obvious? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Here is an issue: if, when questioned on the choic | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It begs the question | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| PLZ SEE THIS | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| DON'T SHOUT! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| what dont shout??? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| ALL CAPS = Shouting | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| but i tried with memory mapped | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Well I'm confused! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| If you know the history ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| You're still guessing | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Clearly, more information is needed! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| How to post schematics & code | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| the problem is ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Then | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Better way | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Google says | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Ok | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| The secret of good interfacing... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| XBY(ADDRESS) - incomplete? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| connection | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| How about IO/M? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Missing Connection | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| two things that do not jive | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| ! - / * | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Jive Bunny | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| not at atll, as long as there is a notation of \'tr | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| If the OP had considered the signal levels, he wou | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Actually Erik... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| YES I misread - no excuse. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| it is amzing to me | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It doesn't matter whether it is old or new | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I'm sure you have not | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Of that there can be no doubt ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| But is it worth it? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes ... but ... and it's a big BUT ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| not that suggestion, but this one | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Programmer?? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| and for the rest ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Hogwash! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| no need to wash the hog | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Really? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| nitpicking | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Once again you demonstrate your narrow view | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| your "narrow view" takes you outside the audience | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Why Indians like 8155/8255 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I/O expansion is not pantyhose, one size does | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Didn\'t you read the previous post? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| whatever, you say you can not get me to say that w | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| of course I did not, i answered without reading th | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| And with all these many highly on-topic posts... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I do not, do any of you? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| What would YOU suggest? ... be specific | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| thanks a lot | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Sorry, but | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Current Technology | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| the typical response | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| This has happened before. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| What an unfriendly reply after all our efforts... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Not so sure... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
