Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Thread Closed: Issue successfully resolved

???
12/18/04 05:02
Read: times


 
#83393 - Parasitic parameters
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Hi Kai,

How true it is. I was never taught this in any of my digital classes, but one of the first things they teach in rf class is that every component of every circuit is a conglomeration of resistance, inductance and capacitance. This is true of caps, inductors, resistors and even the wires and traces that connect them. This is why you often need more than one decoupling cap on a given chip.

List of 59 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Weekend On-Topic (WOnT)            01/01/70 00:00      
   microsoft ??            01/01/70 00:00      
      Cute ;)            01/01/70 00:00      
   Weekend on Topic            01/01/70 00:00      
      A very reasonable hypothesis            01/01/70 00:00      
   happened here            01/01/70 00:00      
      The chip changed            01/01/70 00:00      
         What happened?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Also an excellent hypothesis            01/01/70 00:00      
         too much            01/01/70 00:00      
            Nah.            01/01/70 00:00      
      Me too, But            01/01/70 00:00      
   systematic debugging            01/01/70 00:00      
   Pb-free?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Did the temp characteristics change?            01/01/70 00:00      
   another one from memory            01/01/70 00:00      
   What it's not.            01/01/70 00:00      
      Solution            01/01/70 00:00      
         Speed!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Speed            01/01/70 00:00      
      Would get the oscope, first            01/01/70 00:00      
      Try this            01/01/70 00:00      
      What it is?            01/01/70 00:00      
         Think volume            01/01/70 00:00      
            Not a puzzle!!            01/01/70 00:00      
               Apologies            01/01/70 00:00      
   Re:            01/01/70 00:00      
      Y2K-and-something            01/01/70 00:00      
         Y2K + something            01/01/70 00:00      
            Y2k05            01/01/70 00:00      
               The Unix Epoch and the Year 2038            01/01/70 00:00      
   Yet another true story...            01/01/70 00:00      
      A perfect example            01/01/70 00:00      
         Newer IC            01/01/70 00:00      
      Answer time...?            01/01/70 00:00      
         another guess            01/01/70 00:00      
      language            01/01/70 00:00      
         Faster does not mean better!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Ok            01/01/70 00:00      
               Gladly            01/01/70 00:00      
         To tell the whole truth...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Hidden parameters            01/01/70 00:00      
      Parasitic parameters            01/01/70 00:00      
         Chip manufacturer changed?            01/01/70 00:00      
   Faster/slower or "controlled" rise time            01/01/70 00:00      
   Answer            01/01/70 00:00      
      Amazing....            01/01/70 00:00      
         Amazed            01/01/70 00:00      
            Split Planes            01/01/70 00:00      
      A bit disappointed...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Series resistors and line matching            01/01/70 00:00      
            Series termination resistors            01/01/70 00:00      
            Series termination            01/01/70 00:00      
               SWR            01/01/70 00:00      
               simulation to the rescue            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Thanks!            01/01/70 00:00      
      The same moment?            01/01/70 00:00      
         The same moment!            01/01/70 00:00      
   I'm Back.            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List