Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/29/07 17:30
Read: times


 
Msg Score: +2
 +2 Informative
#131646 - Two sided board alignment
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Hi Mike,

I have two suggestions for you. The first concerns registration (alignment) of the artwork. You are absolutely correct that tape, even clear tape, will interfere with the exposure. This is why you should ensure that it is applied only to areas that are outside the area occupied by your PWB. If your PWB occupies the whole blank board, obviously this is not possible.

In order to accomplish the registration, I used to put cross-hair registration data directly on my transparencies. Ideally this would involve putting a cross-hair datum on the artwork corresponding to the relative positions of each of two opposite corners of the board. Unfortunately, it wasn't really feasible to define the relative positions of opposite corners of the physical board with sufficient accuracy, usually because the edges weren't precisely square. I found that putting the cross-hair data beyond the corners of the board and aligning them to each other often yeilded workable results, but the consistency left much to be desired.

Ultimately I found that the best way to align the artwork was to place a single cross-hair datum to correspond to one corner of the board, and then extend two of its lines along the full length of the two adjacent edges of the board. Then registration was accomplished by aligning the intersection of the lines to the corresponding corner of the board, and rotating the transparency until one of the edges of the board was aligned to one of the cross-hair lines too (making certain to use the same edge for rotational alignment on both sides of course). If I had room for tape I could align and fix the artwork to both sides at once. And if I didn't have room for tape this produced sufficiently repeatable results that I could align and expose each side independently. The results were more than sufficient and impressively repeatable.

Now I have another suggestion. You likely have the ability to "reverse" or "mirror" the artwork when you print it out. You should do this to the artwork for one side of the board. Here's why. When you print your artwork, the actual toner/ink of the image is on one side of the transparency film. If you print both sides normally, then on one side of the board the toner/ink of the image will be physically adjacent to the bare copper, and on the other side it will be separated from the copper by the thickness of the film. You will want to "reverse" or "mirror" print that side so that the toner/ink of the image is physically adjacent to the bare copper on both sides of the board.

This is why. Light refracts around corners. If the light being masked by the toner/ink of the image still has a distance to travel after it's blocked by the image (the thickness of the film), it will refract around the edges of the image and cause a "fuzzing" of the trace edges. The net result will be that you will greatly diminish your ability to produce small scale features. By "reversing" or "mirroring" the appropriate side of your artwork, you will be able to produce nice, clean copper features, and when needed at a much smaller scale.

So there are my two suggestions. Good luck,

Joe

List of 57 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
An 8051 on a DS board            01/01/70 00:00      
   down memory lane            01/01/70 00:00      
      thanks.            01/01/70 00:00      
         Etchant undercutting            01/01/70 00:00      
            photoresist?            01/01/70 00:00      
   I would let them fabricate...            01/01/70 00:00      
      3 or 4 revisions later...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Coming down to earth with a bang...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Yes            01/01/70 00:00      
            Not a valid question            01/01/70 00:00      
               My intention is not what you think...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  SS I think is better            01/01/70 00:00      
                     In your case, wire-wrap would be better yet.            01/01/70 00:00      
                        answer            01/01/70 00:00      
                           one thing at a time ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                              yes I have            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Why?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    even bettwr            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Oh, please, please, please ... not ATMEL!            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Just curious, why?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          Richard has his reasons, here is mine            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Come on, are we snivellers or professionals??            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                no 'advice' in my post            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Semantic quibblings...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Forewarned is forearmed ... once bitten, twice shy            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Waitaminute ... those others didn\'t do that            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   attitude - arrogance we agree            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Our FAE didn't protect us ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Again a single event...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      No, Kai, it's a year-long string of events            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         Then stay away from Atmel's products...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            Yes, that seems to work satisfactorily            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             Well, that's a reason.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                OT - Fortran compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Atmel works for me            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Of course it does            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Off topic, but - Fortan compiler?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Fortran            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Sad but true...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Rob, Caslav Why put that in this thread?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      Agreed...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         Sorry            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         A new thread\'s warranted            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            Anything else?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               Yes...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     SS is easier            01/01/70 00:00      
            It doesn't take long to wire-wrap ...            01/01/70 00:00      
   Two sided board alignment            01/01/70 00:00      
   Q for Mike            01/01/70 00:00      
      F15T8BL            01/01/70 00:00      
         a guide for double sided pcb fab            01/01/70 00:00      
      OSRAM            01/01/70 00:00      
      back in the \"old days\"            01/01/70 00:00      
   a footnote            01/01/70 00:00      
      if you have a ground plane ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         HUH?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Yes, it's the made-in-the-kitchen ones ...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List