??? 02/28/07 20:19 Modified: 02/28/07 20:20 Read: times |
#133966 - I don\'t understand your question, Oleg. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Oleg Sergeev said:
hi,
Richard Erlacher said:
Hmmm ... you consider kitchen appliances, telephones, etc, to be toys?
There are a lot of troubles with power, indeed. Malfunctions in most of them result from it. But I cannot remember about that my home phone (over copper wires) forgets its functions anymore due the program destruction - just because it has no FLASH program memory implemented with toy reset, maybe? Regards, Oleg I edited your first paragraph, above, to what I presume you meant. If that's incorrect, please correct, and forgive, me. I didn't say it was because of program destruction that problems occur. Others have said that, at least with respect to the modern FLASH-based parts, but I don't know what the real problem is. However, I don't see any evidence of a firm link between the reset issue and the FLASH corruption issue. I'd really like it if someone would show me a way in which to guarantee 100% of the time that the flash is verifiably corrupted using an RC reset in which the flash is corrupted 0% of the time when using a "supervisor" or other reset IC. I doubt this is possible, so I don't expect to see it. The problem, as I see it, is that an insufficiently rapid rise-time on Vcc affects everything that relies on Vcc, not just the MCU, and the reset or supervisor IC can't be relied upon to "fix" all that. RE |