Pierce oscillator runs down to Vcc=1.3V! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
you should get a probing set... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I keep the micro always reseted, ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
we already know | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Low voltage operation | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
What puzzles me ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
True Reset | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Thanks, Lynn, for giving us this deep insight! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Scary warnings | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
do you not know ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
What I know about this... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I didn't hear complaints about reset back then | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
MAY??? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Those were different times | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
which troubles? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I don\'t understand your question, Oleg. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
If I could do that, I would be a millionaire from | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
There is an overwhelming evidence! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Conjecture, not Evidence | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
already answered | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
HORSEFEATHERS! ... Read the question | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Do you put in question, that... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Comments on Vdd and Flash | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
not quite true | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I agree... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
by the way | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
state machine decoding... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
well Richard did not read it | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
No, I did read it ... in fact, I read it long ago | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
of course you are not | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
reset etc. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
stories-part II | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
aka experience | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Another Low VDD Story | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
That's how many reset chips work | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
about that I have no doubt ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
You, even less like to read the answers | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
As I said before ... HORSEFEATHERS! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
a horse of a different color | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Flogging a dead (reset?) horse | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
would that not be the case of | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Not defective, just powered down | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
then where is the difference | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Good chips and state machine failures | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Reset seems to be different with static 8052 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
What do you think about my lines, Lynn? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Static and Dynamic Reset, and Lines | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Thanks, the hope dies last... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
why? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Isn't it shocking... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I know a lot ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
...partially... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
The names and functions | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
the analogy | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Flash and Lines | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
So, what the hell is the remedy, then?? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
So long post... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Kai's remarks are germane to the issue | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Stoping the oscillator | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Lynn, pray explain | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Stopped clocks and reset | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
waitaminute.... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
This leads to the conclusion that ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Some further reading | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Let's be general | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
General Reset | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
So ... how do we fix it? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
one thing you could do would be to .. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Tying reset ot crystal enable | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
it's already there... well in some form... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Clock stopping on power-up | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
we have alternatives... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
comments | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
reset (and diode) | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
trying to conclude | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Total agree! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
That's not quite been my experience | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Erik ... That proves nothing! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
what else do you want 'proven' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
suggestion vs. proof | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I need a link | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
well, you do not need tp prove it | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I had not considered these ATMEL (yechh) parts | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
is there no end? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
coincidence is not proof | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Why on earth would I do that? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I would make me do something | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Sadly, few who are in a position to do something | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I am not demanding proof because is isn't there. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Maybe you can get support from Silabs? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
All manufacturers have problems | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
function, not the device | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I like the way you go into the details! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
It puzzles me that no chip maker has done this. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Vdd slew rate as a factor. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I have looked, but since it is not one of 'my' der | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
1 ms Vdd slew rates | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I'd be afraid... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
nope | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
if I specify the slew rate for powerdown... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
No ... I see this as limiting board capcitance | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I know... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
they get what they deserve! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
be realistic | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
it takes more than a supervisor | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
shooting sparrows with RPGs | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
it's not a sparrow, Erik ... it's a vulture | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
as it does not, then why worry | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Erik, I don't know where your head's wedged ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
An almost off-topic comment on Xilinx JTAG | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
there is no problem, so why do you state there is | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
calrification | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
If you would get your head out of your ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
well, if you do not want to 'test' the derivatives | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
If you want yours tested, YOU test 'em | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I did not | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
It's like breaking off the Vcc pin | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
the datasheet states.. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
It's probably ATMEL (yechhh!) that said that | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
rephrased to match this subject | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
the bulletproof '51 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Custom 8051! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
That is not the goal. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
very true ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I don't understand, Erik ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
READ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
when SiLabs builds a DIP-40 or PLCC-44 805x | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
what does the package have to do with slew rate | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Erik ... it has to do with what I'll test. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
well, if you restrict your test to ancients, then | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
current parts, but in DIP40 or PLCC44 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
well you may find that someone sinned but did | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
No manufacturer warns about slew rates!! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
actually I recall one | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I reread the whole link and | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
To Richard | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
it's just "lip-service" and means nothing | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Please, Richard, only facts | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Kai, you can\'t compare the two environments | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
re 'lip service' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
there you go again ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
unless the chairman of the board confess his sin | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
What you\'re spewing is nonsense | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
show what nonsesne you are communicating | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
what is this still about? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
Times change, and so do IC's... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |