Erik Malund said:
so what you say is "unless the chairman of the board confess his sin, it is not evidence".
I didn't say that, but YOU did.
no you did not, but that essentially show what nonsesne you are communicating by correctly parafrasing what you post.

If you'd ever spent any effort in learning about or experiencing the judicial system, you'd have learned that witnesses have to be direct observers of the incidents about which they testify, and, in cases of technical merit, have to be qualified by both depth of education, experience, and standing in the professional community, to be expert in the subject matter about which they're called upon to bear witness.
If you can postulate such nonsense, you have never observed testemony re a persons mental state.

Erik ... While there may be hidden truth in what you are trying to say, the way in which you present it is fundamentally nonsense.
well take what you give Im think "fundamentally nonsense" very well describes your posts

First of all, the majority of 805x-core products seems, at least according to the manufacturers' websites, still to be offered in the "classic" packaging, despite the fact that there are many new features. The package doesn't make them old and obsolete technology.
I never said that, what I said was that volume manufacturers ues TSSOP etc today.

The fact that a manufacturer representative tells you something doesn't make it fact. He's paid to tell you whatever is necessary to get you to buy his product. You should consider the source.
In this case, who givers a hoot what he said, the proof of the pudding is that I have 3000+ years of no failure.

It's not necessary for anyone to confess. It's just necessary for most of us to stop believing them.
believeing WHAT? I believe that with a proper reset it works. That some have a proper reset built in and some require a proper reset externally does not change my "belief"

When they put something into print, which you can take to your lawyer and say, " here's where we were misled into using this component ..." and "Here's how I can prove that this is false." You know you've got reaonably believeable information. In today's business environment, you have to assume everything that's considered a positive is false and intended to mislead.
if you want to go that route, god bless, but do not try to take me with you.

Erik