| ??? 07/26/07 15:44 Read: times |
#142361 - it's far past that time... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
Don't you think it's time someone built an 805x-derivative that was, at least to large extent, predictable in its behavior with respect to Vcc? That time passed long ago - at the moment when the competition (AVR, PIC, and alike) did so - simply starting to put the supervisor internally. They had their bad times, too - anybody who worked with the first flash-based PICs can tell - but soon they got wiser. '51 makers slept further. I don't know how the SiLabs parts perform in this regard, but let's assume they are OK - but except of them, and maybe a few of the high-end derivatives (such as the ADuC's and MSP12xx's which I don't know either) - I know of no other '51 (and notabene a "classical-like") where the manufacturer would clearly indicate the part's behaviour under insufficient power. I understand this is a job the manufacturer don't want to tackle. It's where the circuit is not digital anymore, and analog is hard. On the other hand, I don't see a single reason why would the system designer care of this. JW |



