| ??? 09/30/07 20:14 Modified: 09/30/07 20:25 Read: times |
#145147 - What\'s so \"solid\" about an anecdote? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
to a more precise discussion of how the problems associated with RESET are observed and how their "solutions" are verified.
I gave you two SOLID examples from Erik Malund 02/Aug/07 1:28 pm http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=142662 : customer statements: "we need to power it up twice to make it run" techie statement: "we often have to reflash the boards". Please stop harping on 'scientific' if you have a flat and the problem goes away when you install the spare (I hope not a 'doughnut') what 'scientific' proof do you need that the problem was solved with the change? You are, of course, welcome to search for 'scientific proof' but I (and I'm sure Jan) am getting tired of your eternal reply to the 'proof' that we are satisfied with "it is not scientific". My proof is good enough for me, and I read that Jan's proof is good enough for him. If it is not good enough for you, THEN FIND IT YOURSELF!!!!!! Erik None of what you've stated points directly to a RESET problem. It's a wild guess. Which signals indicated that there was a malfunction? How did you personally observe them? What was different in those signals after you added the supervisor? How was the power supply behaving at power-on? What's the worst-case Vcc current consumption of the board? How did you measure it? How much ripple was there under those worst-case loadings? RE |



