??? 07/06/05 17:49 Read: times |
#96712 - Bad testing Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
We see things like "I did not use a RS232 transciever and tested it, so it is proven that the MAX232(equivalent) is not necessary" The trouble is that the "testing" in this case means merely "I ran it a few times and didn't notice anything wrong" That's nowhere near a thorough test! As I've said before, the code for when everything works fine is likely to be only 10% - the other 90% is coping with everything that could possible go wrong! Thorough testing needs to ensure that all the "exceptional" cases are exercised... |