Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
07/11/05 17:27
Read: times


 		 #97079 - which you must verify which is more work
Responding to: ???'s previous message
which means... .that in 10000 user base you will have 163 people who will help you fix bugs for free, send in patches,
Which you must verify which is more work than fixing the bugs yourself.

I am in a "closed loop open source" environment (getting "suggestions" from our overseas subsidaries) and every time I get a "patch" I have to change e.g. "uchar" to "U8" comments to TVna standard (sometimes translate them to english) and, in the end, find that it would have been faster to fix the bug myself.

I can see an open source project stating off something like this
#define UCHAR unsigned char
#define uchar unsigned char
#define UC unsigned char
#define U8 unsigned char
#define ralph unsigned char

to accomodate the fancies of all participants.

and, oh boy, would that make it easy to read

Erik


List of 105 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
disciplined clear process for debugging            01/01/70 00:00      
   Use a scope!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Design for debug            01/01/70 00:00      
      comments            01/01/70 00:00      
         Comments on comments            01/01/70 00:00      
            In the eyes of the beholder            01/01/70 00:00      
               budget            01/01/70 00:00      
                  budget            01/01/70 00:00      
                     that is when it will be needed            01/01/70 00:00      
                        unless...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           you do not get the point            01/01/70 00:00      
                              shoud I?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Yes.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 inconsequent            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    no, no, no...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       then why            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          ...which means...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             which you must verify which is more work            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Coding style...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   that's impossible            01/01/70 00:00      
               9 out of 10 cats prefer it            01/01/70 00:00      
                  corrections            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Experience, not correction.            01/01/70 00:00      
                        I'm curious            01/01/70 00:00      
                           no ICE            01/01/70 00:00      
         I like Serial Debugging            01/01/70 00:00      
         re:ice            01/01/70 00:00      
            Don't put the bugs in!            01/01/70 00:00      
               your brain is your best debugger            01/01/70 00:00      
                  not always so            01/01/70 00:00      
                     blindness            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Tell it to the gatepost            01/01/70 00:00      
                           are you calling            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Simpler help.            01/01/70 00:00      
                              clerical errors            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Re:            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    when quoting, be complete            01/01/70 00:00      
                        re:blindness            01/01/70 00:00      
                           testing            01/01/70 00:00      
                              debugging is NOT testing            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 not according to NASA            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    What?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       unnecessary code            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       read all about it            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          that's the difference ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             I agree with NASA, you do not            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 terminology            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    definintions?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           when designing devices that can harm lif            01/01/70 00:00      
                              re:don't do harm            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 another article of interest            01/01/70 00:00      
                  WYWIWYS            01/01/70 00:00      
                     An old programmer's law            01/01/70 00:00      
                        An Old Programmer's response            01/01/70 00:00      
                           perfect communication            01/01/70 00:00      
   hmmmm            01/01/70 00:00      
      Learning.            01/01/70 00:00      
      Sorry Mr. Professional            01/01/70 00:00      
         don't read if they are boring            01/01/70 00:00      
            Allright            01/01/70 00:00      
               as I said            01/01/70 00:00      
   Thanks Payam!            01/01/70 00:00      
      Don't let Erik see that!            01/01/70 00:00      
         Bad engineering            01/01/70 00:00      
            I don't think it is bad engineering!            01/01/70 00:00      
               Calm down - it's only a joke!            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Yes and no            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Testing            01/01/70 00:00      
                        succesful testing does not prove the abs            01/01/70 00:00      
                           The proof is in the pudding            01/01/70 00:00      
                              you can't            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Proving            01/01/70 00:00      
                           successful testing!            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Bad testing            01/01/70 00:00      
                              bad, maybe, but possibly complete            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Perfect vs Good Enough.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    the slippery slope            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       90% agreement.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          then why do you discuss releasing progra            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             I don't "release".            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                Is repeating part of the question an ans            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   Yes.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      not authority but knowledge            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         Where...?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            do you really think that anyone consider            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               The $3.000.000 machine            01/01/70 00:00      
            Yes, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
   I have one more ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      CVS or SVN            01/01/70 00:00      
         ....            01/01/70 00:00      
   re:ISR            01/01/70 00:00      
      defeating a purpose            01/01/70 00:00      
         re:ISR            01/01/70 00:00      
   Wikipedia:: debugging (etc.)            01/01/70 00:00      
   Another one for your list            01/01/70 00:00      
   PC-LINT            01/01/70 00:00      
      anyone not using it?            01/01/70 00:00      
         re:anyone not using it            01/01/70 00:00      
            PC lint cost about $200            01/01/70 00:00      
               PC Lint            01/01/70 00:00      
            PC lint cost about $200            01/01/70 00:00      
               Not Always            01/01/70 00:00      
                  amen to that            01/01/70 00:00      
   All nice and pretty...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Noise problems?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List