Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread

??? 07/08/05 12:03 Read: times	#96825 - amen to that Responding to: ???'s previous message
	It does force you to write better code amen to that

List of 105 messages in thread

Topic	Author	Date
disciplined clear process for debugging		01/01/70 00:00
Use a scope!		01/01/70 00:00
Design for debug		01/01/70 00:00
comments		01/01/70 00:00
Comments on comments		01/01/70 00:00
In the eyes of the beholder		01/01/70 00:00
budget		01/01/70 00:00
budget		01/01/70 00:00
that is when it will be needed		01/01/70 00:00
unless...		01/01/70 00:00
you do not get the point		01/01/70 00:00
shoud I?		01/01/70 00:00
Yes.		01/01/70 00:00
inconsequent		01/01/70 00:00
no, no, no...		01/01/70 00:00
then why		01/01/70 00:00
...which means...		01/01/70 00:00
which you must verify which is more work		01/01/70 00:00
Coding style...		01/01/70 00:00
that's impossible		01/01/70 00:00
9 out of 10 cats prefer it		01/01/70 00:00
corrections		01/01/70 00:00
Experience, not correction.		01/01/70 00:00
I'm curious		01/01/70 00:00
no ICE		01/01/70 00:00
I like Serial Debugging		01/01/70 00:00
re:ice		01/01/70 00:00
Don't put the bugs in!		01/01/70 00:00
your brain is your best debugger		01/01/70 00:00
not always so		01/01/70 00:00
blindness		01/01/70 00:00
Tell it to the gatepost		01/01/70 00:00
are you calling		01/01/70 00:00
Simpler help.		01/01/70 00:00
clerical errors		01/01/70 00:00
Re:		01/01/70 00:00
when quoting, be complete		01/01/70 00:00
re:blindness		01/01/70 00:00
testing		01/01/70 00:00
debugging is NOT testing		01/01/70 00:00
not according to NASA		01/01/70 00:00
What?		01/01/70 00:00
unnecessary code		01/01/70 00:00
read all about it		01/01/70 00:00
that's the difference ...		01/01/70 00:00
I agree with NASA, you do not		01/01/70 00:00
terminology		01/01/70 00:00
definintions?		01/01/70 00:00
when designing devices that can harm lif		01/01/70 00:00
re:don't do harm		01/01/70 00:00
another article of interest		01/01/70 00:00
WYWIWYS		01/01/70 00:00
An old programmer's law		01/01/70 00:00
An Old Programmer's response		01/01/70 00:00
perfect communication		01/01/70 00:00
hmmmm		01/01/70 00:00
Learning.		01/01/70 00:00
Sorry Mr. Professional		01/01/70 00:00
don't read if they are boring		01/01/70 00:00
Allright		01/01/70 00:00
as I said		01/01/70 00:00
Thanks Payam!		01/01/70 00:00
Don't let Erik see that!		01/01/70 00:00
Bad engineering		01/01/70 00:00
I don't think it is bad engineering!		01/01/70 00:00
Calm down - it's only a joke!		01/01/70 00:00
Yes and no		01/01/70 00:00
Testing		01/01/70 00:00
succesful testing does not prove the abs		01/01/70 00:00
The proof is in the pudding		01/01/70 00:00
you can't		01/01/70 00:00
Proving		01/01/70 00:00
successful testing!		01/01/70 00:00
Bad testing		01/01/70 00:00
bad, maybe, but possibly complete		01/01/70 00:00
Perfect vs Good Enough.		01/01/70 00:00
the slippery slope		01/01/70 00:00
90% agreement.		01/01/70 00:00
then why do you discuss releasing progra		01/01/70 00:00
I don't "release".		01/01/70 00:00
Is repeating part of the question an ans		01/01/70 00:00
Yes.		01/01/70 00:00
not authority but knowledge		01/01/70 00:00
Where...?		01/01/70 00:00
do you really think that anyone consider		01/01/70 00:00
The $3.000.000 machine		01/01/70 00:00
Yes, but...		01/01/70 00:00
I have one more ...		01/01/70 00:00
CVS or SVN		01/01/70 00:00
....		01/01/70 00:00
re:ISR		01/01/70 00:00
defeating a purpose		01/01/70 00:00
re:ISR		01/01/70 00:00
Wikipedia:: debugging (etc.)		01/01/70 00:00
Another one for your list		01/01/70 00:00
PC-LINT		01/01/70 00:00
anyone not using it?		01/01/70 00:00
re:anyone not using it		01/01/70 00:00
PC lint cost about $200		01/01/70 00:00
PC Lint		01/01/70 00:00
PC lint cost about $200		01/01/70 00:00
Not Always		01/01/70 00:00
amen to that		01/01/70 00:00
All nice and pretty...		01/01/70 00:00
Noise problems?		01/01/70 00:00

Back to Subject List