Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread

??? 03/01/05 21:41 Read: times	#88810 - because? Responding to: ???'s previous message
	DS80C400 would be a dream device if it had some programmable flash, no need for external program memory... because?

List of 93 messages in thread

Topic	Author	Date
Kitchen sink (wanted features)		01/01/70 00:00
The obvious answer		01/01/70 00:00
Increased ALU capacity?		01/01/70 00:00
atleast 16 bit ALU		01/01/70 00:00
addendum to obvious answer		01/01/70 00:00
quite useless		01/01/70 00:00
Dallas		01/01/70 00:00
16 bit ALU etc		01/01/70 00:00
Kitchen sinks around...		01/01/70 00:00
nope		01/01/70 00:00
Whichever...		01/01/70 00:00
If Philips did it so can others		01/01/70 00:00
ARM		01/01/70 00:00
FPGA - panacea?		01/01/70 00:00
No panacea		01/01/70 00:00
All data locations are bit-addressable.		01/01/70 00:00
what I want		01/01/70 00:00
Already done!		01/01/70 00:00
next step...		01/01/70 00:00
I would say ...		01/01/70 00:00
Flash RAM?		01/01/70 00:00
NV RAM		01/01/70 00:00
back up power		01/01/70 00:00
some non volatile RAM		01/01/70 00:00
some non volatile RAM		01/01/70 00:00
reset		01/01/70 00:00
Did'nt you get anything for Christmas?		01/01/70 00:00
The LPC has these		01/01/70 00:00
I forgot to say...		01/01/70 00:00
Sorry I just did that		01/01/70 00:00
Want true 16-bit PWM Support		01/01/70 00:00
Additional memory support		01/01/70 00:00
Why didnt you say Michael??		01/01/70 00:00
Some usefull things.		01/01/70 00:00
Interrupts		01/01/70 00:00
what I have made external		01/01/70 00:00
expression		01/01/70 00:00
USB master,		01/01/70 00:00
because?		01/01/70 00:00
because...		01/01/70 00:00
the other because		01/01/70 00:00
Stack?		01/01/70 00:00
separate memory space for stack		01/01/70 00:00
stack et al.		01/01/70 00:00
stack and rest features		01/01/70 00:00
stack and the manufacturers		01/01/70 00:00
Morpheus		01/01/70 00:00
makers and Ultra51 from Winedge		01/01/70 00:00
There's the catch!		01/01/70 00:00
DEC DPTR		01/01/70 00:00
Maybe not so useless		01/01/70 00:00
not quite...		01/01/70 00:00
My opinion		01/01/70 00:00
16-bit SP and Ri		01/01/70 00:00
if that's the goal		01/01/70 00:00
Hardware and software relationship		01/01/70 00:00
re Hardware and software relationship		01/01/70 00:00
Compiler efficiency		01/01/70 00:00
Much simpler		01/01/70 00:00
not6 KISS but KICI		01/01/70 00:00
16-bit Ri II		01/01/70 00:00
16 bits and pieces		01/01/70 00:00
16 bit Ri ad nauseam		01/01/70 00:00
16bit pointers: a different view		01/01/70 00:00
compiler compatibility		01/01/70 00:00
Yes, the compiler - here comes gcc		01/01/70 00:00
Oh boy		01/01/70 00:00
depends on people and perhaps motivation		01/01/70 00:00
you are making my point		01/01/70 00:00
Also		01/01/70 00:00
no more gcc		01/01/70 00:00
Open source '52 Pascal Compiler		01/01/70 00:00
compiler design		01/01/70 00:00
absolutely		01/01/70 00:00
New features		01/01/70 00:00
what happens...		01/01/70 00:00
bank selectors		01/01/70 00:00
Hanging a bag on the 8051 will fail...		01/01/70 00:00
Bravo, but		01/01/70 00:00
XA vs 251		01/01/70 00:00
23-bit		01/01/70 00:00
42 bit...		01/01/70 00:00
never happens		01/01/70 00:00
No mods for my code...		01/01/70 00:00
XA compatibility		01/01/70 00:00
re: USB master		01/01/70 00:00
Features I want:		01/01/70 00:00
High Speed ADC and SRAM		01/01/70 00:00
I conclude		01/01/70 00:00
actually 23 bit does exist		01/01/70 00:00
Dreams come to product		01/01/70 00:00
Dreams come -they came		01/01/70 00:00
wide Vcc range		01/01/70 00:00

Back to Subject List