??? 09/02/04 17:27 Read: times |
#76824 - RE: Revisiting video & emulation Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Craig,
Maybe video needn't be decided to "strictly". Decide an interface. How would the central '51 processor write to video? With this flexibility, a single chip '51 video display (which would be a lot of fun and challenge) would be just as approp as a VGA approach. Now if the need for a single approach was desired perhaps a decision regarding two issues would help: 1) Target monitor (TV or VGA) 2) Color/Mono. In a way the question is do you retain the "Atari" or adopt a "PC" metaphor. Basic greyscale to a Television target is pretty easy and their are many examples extant. This could be done with a single '51 variant but keep in mind that done this way you have no more screen display than you have integrated RAM. Why build a character display when bit mapping extends the functionality of even the lowest of resolution displays? With external hardware (counters/comparitors/SRAM) things are much easier. Color agility is do-able but more complex and would require external hardware "end of song" for a TV target. VGA monitor interfacing is again pretty straight forward you provide the H-sync (~34kHz)/V-sync(60/72Hz) The pixel rate (co-ordinated with the sync) will be what ever rate you can shift pixels out. A single Par/Ser chip reduces the u-controller requirement nicely. regards, p |