??? 02/17/05 08:16 Read: times |
#87743 - less complex/less expensive Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi,
I understand that you want to do this 32:1 multiplexing, in order to keep the application less complex, right? Best. |
??? 02/17/05 08:16 Read: times |
#87743 - less complex/less expensive Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi,
I understand that you want to do this 32:1 multiplexing, in order to keep the application less complex, right? Best. |